Skip to content
My Activism

The Graveyard of Empires: Why The Middle East Cannot be Conquered

The Graveyard of Empires: Why The Middle East Cannot be Conquered

Do you love this image? Check it out here on Etsy.

The Middle East, often referred to as the "graveyard of empires," has witnessed the rise and fall of numerous dominant powers throughout history. This article explores the long and well-documented history of various empires, from the ancient Egyptian campaign at Kadesh to the Crusades, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and modern-day American support for Israel. Each campaign sought to dominate the region but ultimately faced insurmountable resistance from the peoples of the Levant. Through historical analysis, this article aims to understand why this region has repeatedly thwarted imperial ambitions.

"The graveyard of empires" is a term commonly used to describe the historical tendency of powerful empires to meet their downfall when attempting to conquer or control the vast and complex region of Afghanistan. While the exact origin of the phrase is unclear, it gained prominence during the 19th and 20th centuries as Western powers, particularly Britain and the Soviet Union, faced significant challenges in their military campaigns in Afghanistan; however, the region more broadly adheres to this ordained fate.

Introduction to the Unconquerable Middle East

The Middle East, a region of immense strategic, economic, and cultural significance, has been the focal point of numerous imperial campaigns. Despite their power and resources, many empires have failed to establish lasting control over the region. The term “graveyard of empires” aptly describes the Middle East’s historical role in the downfall of these dominant forces. This article examines the historical context and specific campaigns of the ancient Egyptians, Crusaders, Soviets, and modern Americans to understand the enduring resistance of the Levantine peoples.

Ancient Egyptian Campaign at Kadesh

Historical Context

The Battle of Kadesh, fought in 1274 BCE between the Egyptian Empire under Pharaoh Ramses II and the Hittite Empire, is one of the earliest recorded military engagements in history. The Egyptians sought to expand their influence in the Levant, a region critical for trade and military strategy.

Campaign and Outcome

Despite initial successes, the Egyptians faced fierce resistance from the Hittites and their Levantine allies. The battle ended in a stalemate, leading to the first recorded peace treaty in history. The Egyptian Empire’s ambitions were curtailed, highlighting the region’s resilience against foreign domination. This overextension of resources marked the beginning of the end of the strength of the ancient Egyptian empire, so much so that soon afterwards it became almost impossible for the Egyptian state to even defend its own borders.

Alexander the Great’s Campaign: A Historical Precedent

Historical Context

In the 4th century BCE, Alexander the Great, king of Macedon, embarked on an ambitious military campaign to conquer the Persian Empire and extend his influence across the Middle East and Central Asia. His conquests reshaped the geopolitical landscape of the ancient world and laid the foundation for Hellenistic culture.

Campaign and Outcome

Conquest of Persia: Alexander’s military prowess and strategic genius enabled him to swiftly defeat the Persian forces in a series of decisive battles, including the Battle of Issus and the Battle of Gaugamela. He subsequently captured key Persian cities, including Babylon and Persepolis, effectively bringing an end to the Achaemenid Empire.

Expansion into Central Asia: Buoyed by his early successes, Alexander continued his campaign eastward, venturing into Central Asia and reaching as far as modern-day Pakistan and India. However, his conquests faced increasing resistance from local populations and logistical challenges, leading to growing discontent among his troops.

Retreat and Legacy: Facing mounting opposition and the reluctance of his exhausted soldiers to continue the campaign, Alexander reluctantly began his journey back westward. His retreat through the Gedrosian Desert was marked by hardship and suffering, resulting in significant losses. Alexander died in 323 BCE, leaving behind a vast empire that soon fragmented under the rule of his successors.


Alexander the Great’s failed campaign in the Middle East serves as a historical precedent for the challenges faced by imperial powers in the region. Despite his remarkable military achievements, Alexander encountered formidable resistance from local populations and geographic obstacles that ultimately thwarted his ambitions of establishing a lasting empire.

Alexander’s campaign in the 4th century BCE exemplifies the struggles of imperial powers in the Middle East and their eventual downfall. His failed attempt to conquer the region underscores its reputation as the “graveyard of empires,” where ambitious conquerors have historically met formidable resistance and faced insurmountable challenges.

The Graveyard of Empires: Why The Middle East Cannot be Conquered
Do you love this image? Check it out here on Etsy.

The Crusades

Historical Context

The Crusades, spanning from the late 11th to the late 13th centuries, were a series of religious and military campaigns initiated by European powers to reclaim the Holy Land from Muslim control. The Levant was seen as the key to Christian hegemony in the Near East.

Campaign and Outcome

Despite capturing Jerusalem in 1099 during the First Crusade, the Crusaders faced continuous resistance from Muslim forces, notably under leaders like Saladin. By 1291, the Crusader states had collapsed, and the region returned to Muslim control. The Crusades ultimately failed to establish long-term dominance, underscoring the resilience and determination of the local population.

French Colonial Presence in Syria: Another Failed Endeavor

Historical Context

After the First World War, the French Empire sought to extend its influence in the Middle East by establishing control over Syria, then part of the Ottoman Empire. However, their attempts to sustain their presence in the region were met with resistance and ultimately contributed to the decline of the French Empire.

Campaign and Outcome

Syrian Mandate:

Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Syria came under French control as a mandate from the League of Nations. The French sought to assert their authority through military occupation and the imposition of colonial administration.

Resistance and Revolts:

The Syrian population, resentful of foreign rule and inspired by nationalist movements, staged numerous uprisings and protests against French colonialism. These revolts, coupled with international pressure and internal dissent within France, undermined the stability of the colonial regime.

End of French Rule:

In 1946, after years of resistance and struggle, Syria gained independence from French rule. The failure to sustain their presence in Syria marked a significant blow to the French Empire, hastening its decline and eventual dissolution.


The French Empire’s inability to sustain its presence in Syria highlights the enduring resilience of the Middle East against foreign domination. Despite their military and economic resources, colonial powers like France faced insurmountable challenges in maintaining control over the region.

Connection to “The Graveyard of Empires”

The French Empire’s failed colonial venture in Syria is yet another example of the Middle East’s reputation as the “graveyard of empires.” Like their predecessors, the French encountered fierce resistance and ultimately suffered defeat, marking the end of their imperial ambitions in the region.

The French Empire’s failed attempt to sustain its presence in Syria underscores the historical pattern of imperial overreach and failure in the Middle East. As with past empires, the French were unable to overcome the resistance of the local population and maintain control over the region. This serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges inherent in attempting to conquer the Middle East and the enduring resilience of its peoples against foreign domination.

British Empire’s Failed Attempts in the 19th Century

Historical Context

During the 19th century, the British Empire, at the height of its power, sought to expand its influence into the Middle East, drawn by strategic interests in trade routes, access to resources, and geopolitical dominance. However, these ambitions were met with significant challenges and ultimately contributed to the decline of the empire.

Campaigns and Outcomes

First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–1842):
In an attempt to secure Afghanistan as a buffer against Russian expansionism, the British launched the First Anglo-Afghan War. Despite initial successes, including the capture of Kabul, the British faced fierce resistance from Afghan tribes and harsh winter conditions. The conflict ended in a disastrous retreat, with the majority of British forces massacred or captured during their withdrawal from Kabul. The humiliating defeat tarnished British prestige and raised doubts about the feasibility of controlling Afghanistan.

First and Second Opium Wars (1839–1842, 1856–1860):
In the 19th century, the British Empire waged two Opium Wars against China to protect its lucrative opium trade and secure access to Chinese markets. While not directly related to the Middle East, these conflicts demonstrated the limits of British military power and the challenges of enforcing imperial authority in distant regions.

Failed Expeditions in Persia and Arabia:
Throughout the 19th century, the British conducted various military expeditions and diplomatic interventions in Persia (modern-day Iran) and Arabia, aimed at securing influence and protecting British interests. However, these efforts often ended in diplomatic stalemates or failed attempts to impose British control, highlighting the complexities of regional politics and the resistance of local populations.


The British Empire’s multiple failed attempts to conquer the Middle East in the 19th century marked a turning point in its imperial ambitions. These defeats exposed the limitations of British military power and the challenges of controlling distant and culturally complex regions. Moreover, they contributed to a growing sense of imperial overreach and sowed the seeds of discontent among colonial subjects, hastening the decline of the empire.

Connection to “The Graveyard of Empires”

The British Empire’s experiences in the Middle East during the 19th century exemplify the region’s reputation as the “graveyard of empires.” Despite its formidable military and economic resources, the empire encountered fierce resistance and suffered humiliating defeats, underscoring the enduring resilience of local populations and the complexities of regional politics.

The British Empire’s failed attempts to conquer the Middle East in the 19th century serve as a cautionary tale of imperial overreach and the challenges of maintaining control in distant regions. These defeats marked a turning point in the empire’s fortunes and contributed to its eventual decline. As modern powers continue to navigate the complexities of the Middle East, the lessons of history remain relevant, highlighting the enduring resilience of the region and its people.

Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan

Historical Context

In 1979, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, aiming to support the communist government and extend its influence in the Middle East. Afghanistan’s strategic location made it a valuable asset in Cold War geopolitics.

Campaign and Outcome

The Soviet campaign quickly bogged down in guerrilla warfare, with Afghan mujahideen receiving substantial support from the United States and other countries. After a decade of intense conflict, the Soviet Union withdrew in 1989, suffering significant losses and contributing to its eventual collapse. The Afghan resistance, deeply rooted in local culture and religion, proved insurmountable for the Soviet military machine.

The Graveyard of Empires: Why The Middle East Cannot be Conquered
Do you love this painting? Check it out here on Etsy.

Post-9/11 American Invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan

Historical Context

Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, the Bush administration initiated military interventions in both Iraq and Afghanistan as part of the broader “War on Terror.” These invasions were characterized by the aim of dismantling terrorist networks, removing hostile regimes, and promoting democracy in the region.

Campaign and Outcome

Iraq Invasion:
The 2003 invasion of Iraq was justified by claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and links to terrorist organizations. However, the subsequent occupation led to widespread insurgency, sectarian violence, and instability. The failure to find WMDs and the revelation of faulty intelligence undermined the legitimacy of the war. The prolonged conflict resulted in thousands of casualties, strained military resources, and eroded public support both domestically and internationally.

Afghanistan Invasion:
The invasion of Afghanistan aimed to overthrow the Taliban regime, which harboured Al-Qaeda operatives responsible for the 9/11 attacks. While initially successful in toppling the Taliban, the mission shifted towards nation-building and counterinsurgency efforts. However, the Taliban insurgency persisted, fuelled by grievances against foreign occupation and corruption within the Afghan government. Despite significant military and financial investments, the conflict became the longest war in American history, with little progress towards stability or peace.

Military, Political, and Public Relations Disaster

The post-9/11 invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were marred by a series of military, political, and public relations setbacks:

  • Military Quagmire: Both wars devolved into protracted conflicts, straining military resources and resulting in significant casualties on all sides. The failure to achieve decisive victories undermined morale and operational effectiveness.
  • Political Fallout: The invasions sparked widespread international condemnation and strained diplomatic relations. The absence of clear exit strategies and the inability to establish stable governments fuelled scepticism about American intentions and capabilities.
  • Public Relations Backlash: The wars faced growing opposition from the American public and the international community. Mismanagement, civilian casualties, and allegations of human rights abuses tarnished America’s image and credibility on the global stage.

The post-9/11 American invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan serve as cautionary tales of the perils of military intervention and nation-building. Despite initial goals of countering terrorism and promoting democracy, both campaigns ended in prolonged conflict, instability, and disillusionment. These experiences underscore the importance of strategic foresight, diplomatic engagement, and respect for local dynamics in addressing complex geopolitical challenges.

Modern American Support for Israel

Historical Context

Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has been a key ally of the United States in the Middle East. American support has been crucial in various conflicts, including wars with neighbouring Arab states and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Campaign and Outcome

Despite overwhelming military support, Israel has been unable to achieve lasting peace or complete dominance over Palestine. The Palestinian resistance, characterized by intifadas and ongoing protests, highlights the enduring struggle for self-determination. The complex socio-political dynamics of the region, coupled with international pressures, have prevented a definitive resolution.

Discussion of the Indominable Middle East

Resilience of Levantine Peoples

A common thread in these historical campaigns is the remarkable resilience of the Levantine peoples. Cultural cohesion, strong religious beliefs, and a deep connection to the land have fuelled their resistance against foreign domination. This resilience has repeatedly frustrated the ambitions of external powers.

Geopolitical Complexity

The Middle East’s geopolitical complexity has also played a significant role. The region’s diverse ethnic and religious landscape, combined with its strategic importance, has made it a challenging environment for any single power to control. The interplay of local and international forces has often undermined imperial campaigns.

Lessons for Modern Empires

The historical record of the Middle East as the “graveyard of empires” offers valuable lessons for modern powers. Understanding the region’s unique dynamics is crucial for any engagement. The failures of past empires underscore the importance of respecting local cultures and fostering genuine, sustainable relationships rather than imposing external control.

Current American-Israeli Colonization: A Predestined Failure

The current American-Israeli colonization of Palestine echoes the failed attempts of past empires to conquer the Middle East. Despite their military and economic might, these powers have consistently encountered resistance and ultimately faced defeat. The ongoing occupation of Palestine is poised to follow a similar trajectory, marking a pivotal moment in the decline of American significance and dominance on the global stage.

Context of the Occupation

The American-Israeli colonization of Palestine dates back to the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 and the subsequent displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes. Since then, Israel, with significant support from the United States, has maintained control over Palestinian territories through military occupation, settlement expansion, and the imposition of restrictive policies.

Inevitable Failure

As with all who have come before them, the current American-Israeli colonization is predestined to fail in its quest to conquer the Middle East. The occupation of Palestine, characterized by human rights abuses, land seizures, and the suppression of Palestinian rights, has sparked international condemnation and fuelled ongoing resistance. The resilience of the Palestinian people and the solidarity of global movements for justice and freedom will ultimately prove insurmountable for the occupying forces.

Beginning of the End of the Empire

The continuation of the American-Israeli occupation of Palestine marks the beginning of the end of American significance and dominance on a global scale. The moral and ethical bankruptcy of supporting such colonial endeavours undermines America’s standing as a champion of democracy and human rights. Moreover, the occupation fuels anti-American sentiment and erodes alliances, further diminishing America’s influence and credibility in the international community.

The current American-Israeli colonization of Palestine represents a tragic continuation of the historical pattern of imperial overreach and failure in the Middle East. As with past empires, the occupation is doomed to fail in its quest for dominance. The resistance of the Palestinian people and the global outcry against injustice signal a turning point in the decline of American significance and dominance on the world stage. It is imperative that the international community stand in solidarity with the Palestinian cause and work towards a just and lasting resolution to the conflict, rooted in equality, justice, and self-determination.

Final Word on the Graveyard of Empires

The Middle East’s history as the “graveyard of empires” is a testament to the enduring strength and resilience of its peoples. From the ancient Egyptian campaign at Kadesh to the modern American involvement in Israel, the region has consistently thwarted attempts at dominance. As contemporary powers continue to engage with the Middle East, the lessons of history remain relevant, emphasizing the need for a nuanced and respectful approach to this complex and storied region.


  1. Kitchen, K. A. (2003). On the reliability of the Old Testament. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  2. Riley-Smith, J. (2005). The Crusades: A History. Yale University Press.
  3. Coll, S. (2004). Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001. Penguin Books.
  4. Morris, B. (2001). Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881–2001. Vintage.
  5. Fisk, R. (2006). The Great War for Civilization: The Conquest of the Middle East. Vintage.


Amazon has graciously invited me to take part in their Amazon Influencer Program. As such, I now have a storefront on Amazon. Don’t forget to check it out to see all my favourite products, such as my bookshelf, my summer and winter fashion finds, and my go-to holistic health products. Please note that some of my posts may contain affiliate links. If you click on an affiliate link and later make a purchase, I may receive a small commission.  Clicking on an affiliate link may earn a commission but does not result in additional charges to you or cost you anything extra. However, it helps to support me to keep bringing you honest work.

Share this Article


This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top